> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgsql-odbc-owner@postgresql.org
> [mailto:pgsql-odbc-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Joshua D. Drake
> Sent: 28 September 2006 23:26
> To: pgsql-odbc@postgresql.org
> Subject: [ODBC] PGDG ODBC, ODBCng, DBD::Pg
>
> Hello,
>
> I was running some basic benchmarks in comparison of the three
> aforementioned products. I thought I would drop a link here for people
> to compare:
>
> http://projects.commandprompt.com/public/odbcng/wiki/Performance
>
> One thing of note that is very positive IMHO is that PGDG ODBC and
> ODBCng both are showing that they can readily keep up with DBD::Pg in
> terms of basic performance.
>
> Oddly, the ODBCng buffering option doesn't seem to offer as
> much benefit
> as we thought it would but I need to test that with larger
> (wider) data
> sets.
>
> The versions tested were:
>
> PGDG: 08.01.0200-2
> ODBCng: Rev 76
> DBD::Pg: 1.49
Any chance of running the same test again against psqlODBC 08.02.0100?
It's a totally different architecture to the 08.01 series.
You might also try something like odbc-bench for some more realistic
tests.
Cheers, Dave.