Re: postmaster.exe vs postgres.exe (was: CVS HEAD busted on Windows?)

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Dave Page
Тема Re: postmaster.exe vs postgres.exe (was: CVS HEAD busted on Windows?)
Дата
Msg-id E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E401388AFB@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: CVS HEAD busted on Windows?  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Ответы Re: postmaster.exe vs postgres.exe  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Re: postmaster.exe vs postgres.exe (was: CVS HEAD busted on Windows?)  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andrew Dunstan [mailto:andrew@dunslane.net]
> Sent: 22 June 2006 14:06
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: Tom Lane; Peter Eisentraut; pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] CVS HEAD busted on Windows?
>
>
>
> Dave Page wrote:
>
> >
> >As a sidenote on the postgres/postmaster merge subject
> though - Magnus &
> >I were wondering if Peter's change means we no longer need to ship
> >postmaster.exe and postgres.exe with pgInstaller. Presumably
> we can just
> >use postgres.exe for everything now?
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> Won't we still need to know if we are called as postmaster or
> postgres?

Unless the 'postmaster' instance starts all it's sub processes with an
additional option to tell them they're children (I haven't looked at the
code yet so I dunno if this is how it's done).

For those that are unaware, because Windows doesn't support symlinks, we
currently ship two copies of the binary. We could save 3.2MB
(uncompressed, 8.1.4) if we could lose one of them.

Regards, Dave.


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Andrew Dunstan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: CVS HEAD busted on Windows?
Следующее
От: David Roussel
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [PERFORM] Sun Donated a Sun Fire T2000 to the PostgreSQL