> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tony Caduto [mailto:tony_caduto@amsoftwaredesign.com]
> Sent: 12 May 2006 21:24
> To: Dave Page; pgsql-general@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [GENERAL] GUI Interface
>
> Dave calm down....take a chill pill...
> who said anything about pgAdmin III? Jim was referring to
> the tools used to build PGLA, not PGLA itself :-) At least
> that is what I thought he was blabbing about.
> In this particular case the part that is far superior and
> more productive is Borland Delphi and even Visual Studio .net
Yes, misunderstanding - please see my previous email.
> What the heck is slating? All I am doing is saying there is
> a alternative, nothing wrong with that :-)
Slating == berating.
I think it's hard to deny with so many mentions of pgAdmin on your site,
and no mentions of any other similar product that when you say 'PGLA
does this better', or 'has all these extra features' that the intention
is that the user assume you are directly comparing to pgAdmin rather
than any other product. I wouldn't mind if it were all true, but it is
not - the list of features that are not found 'in other products'
contains many that are in pgAdmin, likewise you have at least one quote
that says something like 'everything in pgAdmin is a dialogue' which is
also untrue.
Maybe that's because you don't expect us to sue you like another company
might (and you'd be right), I don't know - perhaps you could prove me
wrong by comparing features of PGLA with Tora or EMS PostgreSQL Manager
as well for example?
Regards, Dave