Re: Cleanup shadows variable warnings, round 1

> On Mar 3, 2026, at 18:26, Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@kurilemu.de> wrote:
>
> Pushed 0001.

Hi Alvaro, thank you very much for pushing 0001. But I don’t see it. I tried to pull master and refresh
https://git.postgresql.org/cgit/postgresql.git/log/?qt=grep&q=,none of them shows 0001 pushed. 


>
> Three things about the next ones,
>
> 1. if you rename a function argument, then the function declaration
> should match the new name as well.

Sure, I will make sure that in next revision.

>
> 2. xlogrecovery.c has far too many global variables.  Can we use this
> opportunity to try to get rid of some of them?  Especially one called
> "xlogreader" is I think quite bug-prone.

Okay, I will try to address this.

>
> 3. I disagree with some of the choices made; for instance rather than
> rename the local "progname" variables in all those places, I would
> rename the global to logging_progname in logging.c; in bringetbitmap
> (0002) I would rename the outer "tmp" to "sizecheck" or something like
> that.  I guess this is mostly matter of mostly arbitrary judgment ...
>

I will rename them per your suggestion, and check if there are similar things to rename.

Best regards,
--
Chao Li (Evan)
HighGo Software Co., Ltd.
https://www.highgo.com/