On Mar 31, 2010, at 11:01 AM, Kevin Grittner wrote:
> That was my first inclination, but the fact that two different
> people talked about using division by '1'::money as a way to convert
> money to another type has me nervous about using an approximate
> type. Any chance you could rework it using numeric? I know it's
> less trivial that way, but unless we provide a cast to numeric, I'm
> afraid people will use the above trick, assign it to a numeric
> variable or column, and then wonder why they've lost precision.
>=20
> Or I guess we could leave this as you've written it and add support
> for a cast from money to numeric.
It probably is wiser to rewrite it with the numeric type. A cast from money=
to numeric is theoretically ambiguous (the result could be either dollars =
or cents), although most people would expect dollars.
I'll see if I can rewrite it with a return type of numeric.