Re: SPITupleTable members missing in docs

> On 12 Jul 2019, at 17:04, Tom Lane  wrote:
> 
> Fabien COELHO  writes:
>> To take into account Tom's comment, I'd suggest a middle ground by 
>> commenting a public and private part explicitely in the struct, something 
>> like:

Thanks for the review!

>>   typedef struct {
>>     /* PUBLIC members to be used by callers ... */
>>     ...
>>     ...
>>     /* PRIVATE members, not intended for external usage ... */
>>     ...
>>   } ... ;
> 
> One problem is that the members we've retroactively decided are "public"
> are in the middle of the struct :-(.
> 
> But it occurs to me that there's no good reason we couldn't re-order the
> members, as long as we only do so on HEAD and not in released versions.
> That would make it a bit less inconsistent and easier to add labels
> such as you suggest.

I quite like this suggestion, so I’ve changed the patch to do this.  Removed
the doc: in the commit message to indicate that this is no longer just touching
documentation.

cheers ./daniel