pgsql: Detect pfree or repalloc of a previously-freed memory chunk.

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема pgsql: Detect pfree or repalloc of a previously-freed memory chunk.
Дата
Msg-id E1w7F4V-002Aio-2u@gemulon.postgresql.org
обсуждение исходный текст
Список pgsql-committers
Detect pfree or repalloc of a previously-freed memory chunk.

Before the major rewrite in commit c6e0fe1f2, AllocSetFree() would
typically crash when asked to free an already-free chunk.  That was
an ugly but serviceable way of detecting coding errors that led to
double pfrees.  But since that rewrite, double pfrees went through
just fine, because the "hdrmask" of a freed chunk isn't changed at all
when putting it on the freelist.  We'd end with a corrupt freelist
that circularly links back to the doubly-freed chunk, which would
usually result in trouble later, far removed from the actual bug.

This situation is no good at all for debugging purposes.  Fortunately,
we can fix it at low cost in MEMORY_CONTEXT_CHECKING builds by making
AllocSetFree() check for chunk->requested_size == InvalidAllocSize,
relying on the pre-existing code that sets it that way just below.

I investigated the alternative of changing a freed chunk's methodid
field, which would allow detection in non-MEMORY_CONTEXT_CHECKING
builds too.  But that adds measurable overhead.  Seeing that we didn't
notice this oversight for more than three years, it's hard to argue
that detecting this type of bug is worth any extra overhead in
production builds.

Likewise fix AllocSetRealloc() to detect repalloc() on a freed chunk,
and apply similar changes in generation.c and slab.c.  (generation.c
would hit an Assert failure anyway, but it seems best to make it act
like aset.c.)  bump.c doesn't need changes since it doesn't support
pfree in the first place.  Ideally alignedalloc.c would receive
similar changes, but in debugging builds it's impossible to reach
AlignedAllocFree() or AlignedAllocRealloc() on a pfreed chunk, because
the underlying context's pfree would have wiped the chunk header of
the aligned chunk.  But that means we should get an error of some
sort, so let's be content with that.

Per investigation of why the test case for bug #19438 didn't appear to
fail in v16 and up, even though the underlying bug was still present.
(This doesn't fix the underlying double-free bug, just cause it to
get detected.)

Bug: #19438
Reported-by: Dmitriy Kuzmin <kuzmin.db4@gmail.com>
Author: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Reviewed-by: David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/19438-9d37b179c56d43aa@postgresql.org
Backpatch-through: 16

Branch
------
REL_16_STABLE

Details
-------
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/a26ac902f662e81f9b8b8ba1e7b784d4ab82b05f

Modified Files
--------------
src/backend/utils/mmgr/aset.c       | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
src/backend/utils/mmgr/generation.c | 10 ++++++++++
src/backend/utils/mmgr/slab.c       |  8 ++++++++
3 files changed, 42 insertions(+)


В списке pgsql-committers по дате отправления: