Re-Align *_freeze_max_age reloption limits with corresponding GUC limits.
In 020235a5754 I lowered the autovacuum_*freeze_max_age minimums to
allow for easier testing of wraparounds. I did not touch the
corresponding per-table limits. While those don't matter for the purpose
of wraparound, it seems more consistent to lower them as well.
It's noteworthy that the previous reloption lower limit for
autovacuum_multixact_freeze_max_age was too high by one magnitude, even
before 020235a5754.
Discussion: 26377.1443105453@sss.pgh.pa.us
Backpatch: back to 9.0 (in parts), like the prior patch
Branch
------
REL9_1_STABLE
Details
-------
http://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/7116a3e98a465a4dced4ecf0b330e0da4bd79873
Modified Files
--------------
src/backend/access/common/reloptions.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)