Re: will an honest French ISP please stand up
От | A. van Roggen |
---|---|
Тема | Re: will an honest French ISP please stand up |
Дата | |
Msg-id | E195uRk-0002RV-00@ganesha.localnet обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: will an honest French ISP please stand up (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote on Wed, 16 Apr 2003 10:48:22 -0400: > I can't speak for what Bruce is filtering, but judging from this message > to the list, your European address is irrelevant. The mail is actually > getting delivered from apps.tgds.net [212.100.226.141]. The blacklist > I use blocks that address because it belongs to rackspace. I have browsed this group for a while, and it seems to me that Tom's input is almost half of the total -- certainly more than half of the useful posts. No wonder he had no time to look up the registration of 'apps.tgds.net'; he has better things to do. It turns out that that address is not registered under any of the 'net' groups, (e.g. nsiregistry.net, networksolutions.com, internic.net, apnic.net, etc.). It still works, although it gave a different address (212.100.232.223) just now after a ping. People using such sites as e-mail address should be warned that part of their mail may not go through. Furthermore, to filter spam it is in my experience more successful by doing it locally, rather than rely on the filters from an ISP (which often block whole regions instead of individual sites). The best filter is 'spamassassin' and is easy to use, very easy if you know a bit about Perl. Disadvantage of local filtering is that the mail must have come through, and thus may be slow for POT (plain old telephone) modems. Keep up the good work on Postgres, which still lacks much good documentation, especially in the interfaces, e.g. Class::DBI and the like. A. van Roggen
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: