Re: Query is over 2x slower with jit=on

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Andres Freund
Тема Re: Query is over 2x slower with jit=on
Дата
Msg-id E174F2D9-4D1E-4C12-A79C-33182CB490CA@anarazel.de
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Query is over 2x slower with jit=on  (Chapman Flack <chap@anastigmatix.net>)
Список pgsql-hackers

On April 18, 2018 9:50:48 AM PDT, Chapman Flack <chap@anastigmatix.net> wrote:
>On 04/18/2018 12:27 PM, Simon Riggs wrote:
>
>> Please change the name of the "JIT" parameter to something meaningful
>> to humans before this gets too far into the wild.
>>
>> SSL is somewhat understandable because its not a Postgres-private
>term.
>
>JIT is hardly a Postgres-private term. It's a familiar term in a
>widespread community, though I might cede the point that the
>community in question is more compiler wonks than DBAs.

You're right. There's another thread where we discussed this. Also due to concern of Simon's. Can we not do so
separatelyhere? 

Andres
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Fujii Masao
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Speedup of relation deletes during recovery
Следующее
От: Teodor Sigaev
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: WIP: Covering + unique indexes.