Re: HOT pgbench results

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Zeugswetter Andreas ADI SD
Тема Re: HOT pgbench results
Дата
Msg-id E1539E0ED7043848906A8FF995BDA5790242290C@m0143.s-mxs.net
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: HOT pgbench results  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
> >         unpatched    HOT
> > autovacuums    116        43
> > autoanalyzes    139        60
>
> > HOT greatly reduces the number of vacuums needed. That's
> good, that's
> > where the gains in throughput in longer I/O bound runs comes from.
>
> But surely failing to auto-analyze after a HOT update is a bad thing.

Well, the definition is that no index columns changed, so this seems
debateable.
It seems for OLTP you should not need an analyze, but for DSS filtering
or joining
on non indexed columns you would. And that would also only be relevant
if you created
custom statistics on non indexed columns.

Andreas


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Gregory Stark
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: More logging for autovacuum
Следующее
От: "Joshua D. Drake"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: More logging for autovacuum