Re: MERGE PARTITIONS and DEPENDS ON EXTENSION.
| От | Matheus Alcantara |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: MERGE PARTITIONS and DEPENDS ON EXTENSION. |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | DHZMP9TM3U3C.2M1RS15KTDWFE@gmail.com обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: MERGE PARTITIONS and DEPENDS ON EXTENSION. (Kirill Reshke <reshkekirill@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: MERGE PARTITIONS and DEPENDS ON EXTENSION.
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed Apr 22, 2026 at 7:48 AM -03, Kirill Reshke wrote: >> +-- An index created directly on a partition has no parent in the partitioned >> +-- index tree; merge must ignore such indexes (they disappear with the old >> +-- partition). >> +CREATE INDEX part_extdep_3_extra_idx ON part_extdep_3(x); >> +ALTER TABLE part_extdep MERGE PARTITIONS (part_extdep_merged, part_extdep_3) >> + INTO part_extdep_merged2; >> +SELECT relname FROM pg_class >> +WHERE relname LIKE 'part_extdep_merged2%idx' ORDER BY relname; > > Looks like this test is also redundant? This does not test new DEPENDS ON logic. > I think that this test is useful to ensure that we correctly skip such indexes created directly on a specific partition. Perhaps we can include an ALTER INDEX ... DEPENDS ON for this specific index to make it more consistent with the other tests? -- Matheus Alcantara EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: