Re: MERGE PARTITIONS and DEPENDS ON EXTENSION.

On Mon Apr 20, 2026 at 4:08 PM -03, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 16, 2026 at 9:03 PM Matheus Alcantara
> <matheusssilv97@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Tue Apr 14, 2026 at 6:05 AM -03, Dmitry Koval wrote:
>> > Hi Matheus!
>> >
>> > Thank you for patch.
>> > I agree that dependency should be automatically added for SPLIT
>> > PARTITION. But I'm not sure about MERGE PARTITION ...
>> > Might be it would be more correct to automatically add a dependency only
>> > if all merged partitions have it?
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Thank you for taking a look on this!
>>
>> I agree with your suggestion. The attached patch implements the
>> intersection behavior for MERGE PARTITIONS: extension dependencies are
>> only preserved on the merged partition's index if all source partition
>> indexes have that dependency.
>>
>> For example:
>> MERGE(idx1(ext_a, ext_b), idx2(ext_a)) -> idx3(ext_a)  -- only ext_a is common
>> MERGE(idx1(ext_a), idx2())             -> idx3()       -- no common deps
>
> This is not obvious for me.  I would rather trigger an error if there
> are different dependencies on merging partitions.
>

Yeah, I agree that this sounds a bit confusing, although this behavior
is documented on the last patch version I think that raising an error is
more simple and maybe is more obvious. The attached patch implement
this.

--
Matheus Alcantara
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com