Re: RDS IO Read time
От | Christophe Pettus |
---|---|
Тема | Re: RDS IO Read time |
Дата | |
Msg-id | DA3CFE03-C653-41D8-8F85-604A948C71F1@thebuild.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | RDS IO Read time (Eden Aharoni <edena@legitsecurity.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: RDS IO Read time
|
Список | pgsql-general |
> On Mar 31, 2025, at 06:54, Eden Aharoni <edena@legitsecurity.com> wrote: > Is this expected IO read rate? I can’t help but feel we’re missing something here.. Really, no particular I/O rate is "expected": if PostgreSQL needs that much data, it'll use that much I/O to get it. Fromyour description, it's likely that it's a case of the working set for the database just not fitting into the memory youhave, so PostgreSQL needs to go out to secondary storage a lot to fetch the data. The best first step is to use Performance Insights to see which queries are using I/O, and run sample ones with EXPLAIN (ANALYZE,BUFFERS) to see where the I/O is being used within the query. Given that you allow users to assemble arbitraryqueries, it's likely that PostgreSQL is having to use a wide variety of indexes (or sequential scans), so it can'tsuccessfully cache a particular set in memory.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: