Pawel Veselov wrote:
>> From your later comments, it's also apparent that these archived WALs will be useless after
>> failover (for the purpose of recovery), so there is no reason to send them to all the nodes after all.
>
> I obviously lost it here. The archives do need to be synchronized, for the purpose of recovering
> slaves. If a slave dies, and I want to recover it, it may need the archived WALs, and for this, the
> archives should be available on the node. So, rsync (or something like that) is necessary. But it's a
> bad idea to run the rsync from the archive command itself.
Right, that's exactly what I tried to say.
Yours,
Laurenz Albe