Thomas Munro wrote:
> I am using 9.1.6, and I've set up a partitioned table as described in
the manual, with partitions
> based on a timestamptz column called 'time'. The exclusion
constraints work nicely when I select
> ranges of times with literal constants. But why would a WHERE clause
like the following not benefit
> from exclusion constraints?
>
> time > TIMESTAMPTZ '2012-11-03 00:00:00Z' + INTERVAL '24 hours'
>
>
> Isn't that expression on the right reducible to a constant up front?
Obviously I can use a host
> language to do the arithmetic and provide a constant, but I am curious
to understand why that wouldn't
> be constant-folded.
I think the problem is that this + operator is implemented
by the function "timestamptz_pl_interval", which is STABLE
but not IMMUTABLE.
I am not sure why this function cannot be IMMUTABLE, it
seems to me that it should be.
Yours,
Laurenz Albe