Re: Playing with set returning functions in SELECT list - behaviour intended?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Albe Laurenz
Тема Re: Playing with set returning functions in SELECT list - behaviour intended?
Дата
Msg-id D960CB61B694CF459DCFB4B0128514C202FF6659@exadv11.host.magwien.gv.at
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Playing with set returning functions in SELECT list - behaviour intended?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: Playing with set returning functions in SELECT list - behaviour intended?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-general
Tom Lane wrote:
> It's always been that way.  The lack of any obviously-sane way to
> handle multiple SRFs in a targetlist is exactly why the feature is
> looked on with disfavor.

It is clear that there is no really good way to handle this.

How about my last example that involved aggregate functions, where
I surprisingly got only one result row?

Yours,
Laurenz Albe

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tuan Hoang Anh
Дата:
Сообщение: Could not reattach to shared memory
Следующее
От: David Fetter
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Custom Fields Database Architecture