Re: Problem with grouping, uses Sort and GroupAggregate, HashAggregate is better(?)
От | Rolf Østvik (HA/EXA) |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Problem with grouping, uses Sort and GroupAggregate, HashAggregate is better(?) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | D7E5DB1F5F917E45AA4DF9F9F1306BEE31E2EC@esealmw111 обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Problem with grouping, uses Sort and GroupAggregate, HashAggregate is better(?) ("Dave Dutcher" <dave@tridecap.com>) |
Список | pgsql-performance |
> -----Original Message----- > From: Dave Dutcher [mailto:dave@tridecap.com] > Sent: Sunday, January 14, 2007 5:12 PM > To: Rolf Østvik (HA/EXA); pgsql-performance@postgresql.org > Subject: RE: [PERFORM] Problem with grouping, uses Sort and > GroupAggregate, HashAggregate is better(?) > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: pgsql-performance-owner@postgresql.org > > [mailto:pgsql-performance-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of > > Rolf Østvik (HA/EXA) > > Have you tried "set enable_sort=off" with 8.1.2? I'm not > sure if that will > change anything because it has to do at least one sort. Its > just a lots > faster to do a hashagg + small sort than one big sort in this > case. (I > wonder if there should be enable_groupagg?) Did you mean enable_sort = 'off' for 8.2.1? I tried to set enable_sort = 'off' for both the 8.1.4 server and the 8.2.1 server. Both servers used the same plan as Run 4 and Run 3 respectively. There were of course some changes in the planner cost for the sort steps, but the execution times was of course the same. Regards Rolf Østvik
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: