Re: OpenSSL 3.0.0 compatibility

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Daniel Gustafsson
Тема Re: OpenSSL 3.0.0 compatibility
Дата
Msg-id D6D2A896-07BE-4427-BB8D-74580D36D290@yesql.se
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: OpenSSL 3.0.0 compatibility  (Jelte Fennema <postgres@jeltef.nl>)
Список pgsql-hackers
> On 29 Jun 2022, at 11:44, Jelte Fennema <postgres@jeltef.nl> wrote:
>
>> See upthread in ef5c7896-20cb-843f-e91e-0ee5f7fd932e@enterprisedb.com
>
> I saw that section, but I thought that only applied before you
> backpatched the actual fixes to PG13 and below. I mean there's no
> reason anymore not to compile those older versions with OpenSSL 3.0,
> right? If so, it seems confusing for the build to spit out warnings
> that indicate the contrary.

The project isn't automatically fixing compiler warnings or library deprecation
warnings in back-branches.  I guess one could make the argument for this case
given how widespread OpenSSL 3.0, but it comes with a significant testing
effort to ensure that all back-branches behave correctly with all version of
OpenSSL so it's not for free (it should be, but with OpenSSL I would personally
not trust that).  Also, PG12 and below had 0.9.8 as minimum version.

--
Daniel Gustafsson        https://vmware.com/




В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Laurenz Albe
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Hardening PostgreSQL via (optional) ban on local file system access
Следующее
От: Marcos Pegoraro
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: better error description on logical replication