Re: index_delete_sort: Unnecessary variable "low" is used in heapam.c
От | Daniel Gustafsson |
---|---|
Тема | Re: index_delete_sort: Unnecessary variable "low" is used in heapam.c |
Дата | |
Msg-id | D5B5B226-1EA5-4831-ACF2-919F14CE27AA@yesql.se обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: index_delete_sort: Unnecessary variable "low" is used in heapam.c (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: index_delete_sort: Unnecessary variable "low" is used in heapam.c
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> On 5 Nov 2024, at 17:40, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com> wrote: > > On 2024/09/24 21:31, Daniel Gustafsson wrote: >>> On 24 Sep 2024, at 10:32, btnakamurakoukil <btnakamurakoukil@oss.nttdata.com> wrote: >>> I noticed unnecessary variable "low" in index_delete_sort() (/postgres/src/backend/access/heap/heapam.c), patch attached.What do you think? >> That variable does indeed seem to not be used, and hasn't been used since it >> was committed in d168b666823. The question is if it's a left-over from >> development which can be removed, or if it should be set and we're missing an >> optimization. Having not read the referenced paper I can't tell so adding >> Peter Geoghegan who wrote this for clarification. > > It's been about a month without updates. How about removing the unnecessary > variable as suggested? We can always add the "missing" logic later if needed. Thanks for reviving this, I had admittedly forgotten about this thread. I don't see any reason to not go ahead with the proposed diff. -- Daniel Gustafsson
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: