Re: numeric precision when raising one numeric to another.

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Dann Corbit
Тема Re: numeric precision when raising one numeric to another.
Дата
Msg-id D425483C2C5C9F49B5B7A41F89441547055BC1@postal.corporate.connx.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на numeric precision when raising one numeric to another.  (Scott Marlowe <smarlowe@g2switchworks.com>)
Список pgsql-general
PostgreSQL has a numeric exp() function and a numeric ln() function, so
a numeric pow() function is trivial.

pow(A,z) = exp(z*ln(A))

Probably, it could be made a bit more efficient if specially tuned so as
to not require these functions.

Newton's method (or something of that nature) could obviously be used to
write a more generic version.  The double C function can provide the
starting estimate.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgsql-general-owner@postgresql.org [mailto:pgsql-general-
> owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Alvaro Herrera
> Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2005 8:33 PM
> To: John Burger
> Cc: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [GENERAL] numeric precision when raising one numeric to
> another.
>
> On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 10:46:50PM -0400, John Burger wrote:
> > >>Considering that the SQL spec says the result of multiplication of
> > >>exact
> > >>numeric types is exact numeric types of precision S1+S2, and
> > >>exponentiation is nothing more than repeated multiplication,
> > >
> > >... not when the exponent is non-integral.
> >
> > For one thing.  For another, I believe the standard C library only
has
> > floating point exponentiation functions, not that there aren't
plenty
> > of numeric libraries with integral ones.  Finally, exponentiated
> > numbers get real big, real fast, and the floating point types can
hold
> > much larger magnitudes than the integer types, albeit inexactly.
For
> > example, on the Mac I'm using now, long long ints max out at about
> > 10^19, while long doubles can represent 10^308.
>
> Well, we already have an interesting library of mathematical functions
> for NUMERIC (which is an arbitrary precision type, so it wouldn't
matter
> how big the result would get).  I think the only reason we don't have
a
> NUMERIC exponentiation function is that nobody has implemented it.
>
> --
> Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[a]surnet.cl>)
> "People get annoyed when you try to debug them."  (Larry Wall)
>
> ---------------------------(end of
broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to
majordomo@postgresql.org

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: James Croft
Дата:
Сообщение: Temp tables as session var containers
Следующее
От: Richard Huxton
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Temp tables as session var containers