Re: Issues with factorial operator
От | Dann Corbit |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Issues with factorial operator |
Дата | |
Msg-id | D425483C2C5C9F49B5B7A41F89441547010006FE@postal.corporate.connx.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Issues with factorial operator ("Cui Shijun" <rancpine@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Issues with factorial operator
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> -----Original Message----- [snip] > Hum... I think there is a little improvement: when n is too large,(say > n>10, 000) we can use Stirling's formula to get the estimated value of > n! :-) Or (rather) the log base 10 of Stirling's formula. The n! estimator will overflow for sure, unless we take the log of it. Rather than all that, why not just figure out what the largest number of digits we will allow is and then don't allow inputs that will generate more than that. The program I gave could be run with the target accuracy as the break out of the loop and then the test would be: <type> factorial(<type> n) { if (n > CONSTANT_PRECOMPUTED_LIMIT) return NULL; else { return compute_actual_factorial(n); } }
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: