Re: There should be a way to use the force flag when restoring databases
| От | Daniel Gustafsson | 
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: There should be a way to use the force flag when restoring databases | 
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | D2DDFAA1-8ECA-4B6C-B531-B8689D587EB7@yesql.se обсуждение исходный текст  | 
		
| Ответ на | Re: There should be a way to use the force flag when restoring databases (Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>) | 
| Ответы | 
                	
            		Re: There should be a way to use the force flag when restoring databases
            		
            		 | 
		
| Список | pgsql-hackers | 
> On 20 Sep 2023, at 11:24, Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org> wrote:
>
> On 06.08.23 21:39, Ahmed Ibrahim wrote:
>> I have addressed the pg version compatibility with the FORCE option in drop. Here is the last version of the patch
>
> The patch is pretty small, but I think there is some disagreement whether we want this option at all?  Maybe some
morepeople can make their opinions more explicit? 
My my concern is that a --force parameter conveys to the user that it's a big
hammer to override things and get them done, when in reality this doesn't do
that.  Taking the example from the pg_restore documentation which currently has
a dropdb step:
====
:~ $ ./bin/createdb foo
:~ $ ./bin/psql -c "create table t(a int);" foo
CREATE TABLE
:~ $ ./bin/pg_dump --format=custom -f foo.dump foo
:~ $ ./bin/pg_restore -d foo -C -c --force foo.dump
pg_restore: error: could not execute query: ERROR:  cannot drop the currently open database
Command was: DROP DATABASE foo WITH(FORCE);
pg_restore: error: could not execute query: ERROR:  database "foo" already exists
Command was: CREATE DATABASE foo WITH TEMPLATE = template0 ENCODING = 'UTF8' LOCALE_PROVIDER = libc LOCALE =
'en_US.UTF-8';
pg_restore: error: could not execute query: ERROR:  relation "t" already exists
Command was: CREATE TABLE public.t (
    a integer
);
pg_restore: warning: errors ignored on restore: 3
====
Without knowing internals, I would expect an option named --force to make that
just work, especially given the documentation provided in this patch.  I think
the risk for user confusion outweighs the benefits, or maybe I'm just not smart
enough to see all the benefits?  If so, I would argue that more documentation
is required.
Skimming the patch itself, it updates the --help output with --force for
pg_dump and not for pg_restore.  Additionally it produces a compilerwarning:
pg_restore.c:127:26: warning: incompatible pointer types initializing 'int *' with an expression of type 'bool *'
[-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
                {"force", no_argument, &force, 1},
                                       ^~~~~~
1 warning generated.
--
Daniel Gustafsson
		
	В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: