Re: [HACKERS] Slow count(*) again...

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Shaun Thomas
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Slow count(*) again...
Дата
Msg-id D247E79EFD801E40A9449A9724F6295B4C5F5FBB@spswchi6mail1.peak6.net
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] Slow count(*) again...  (Mladen Gogala <mladen.gogala@vmsinfo.com>)
Список pgsql-performance
> All other databases do have that feature. I must say, this
> debate gave me a good deal of stuff to think about.

Aaaaand, I think we're done here. The idea that the lack of hints will kill
PostgreSQL is already demonstrably false. This is sounding more and
more like a petulant tantrum.

Folks, I apologize for ever taking part in this conversation and contributing
to the loss of signal to noise. Please forgive me.

--
Shaun Thomas
Peak6 | 141 W. Jackson Blvd. | Suite 800 | Chicago, IL 60604
312-676-8870
sthomas@peak6.com

______________________________________________

See  http://www.peak6.com/email_disclaimer.php
for terms and conditions related to this email

В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Craig James
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Slow count(*) again...
Следующее
От: david@lang.hm
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Slow count(*) again...