RE: MySQL has transactions
От | Willis, Ian (Ento, Canberra) |
---|---|
Тема | RE: MySQL has transactions |
Дата | |
Msg-id | D21A20CD84607E409F314E31F0F68D8A02BF10@cricket-be.ento.csiro.au. обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | MySQL has transactions ("David Wall" <d.wall@computer.org>) |
Ответы |
RE: MySQL has transactions
|
Список | pgsql-general |
speed with tranactions on row level locking I though that postgresql had more data type extensable interface choice of index types better performance under load triggers to name a few. Has anyone actually benchmarked mySQL with transations enabled? -----Original Message----- From: David Wall [mailto:d.wall@computer.org] Sent: Wednesday, 24 January 2001 3:30 PM To: pgsql-general@postgresql.org Subject: [GENERAL] MySQL has transactions Now that MySQL has transaction support through Berkeley DB lib, and it's always had way more data types, what are the main advantages postgresql has over it? I don't think mysql has subselects and such, but they did add a master-slave replication feature as well as online reorganization (perhaps locks tables like vacuum?). Anybody used both of the current releases who can comment? Thanks, David
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: