RE: Timeout parameters

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Jamison, Kirk
Тема RE: Timeout parameters
Дата
Msg-id D09B13F772D2274BB348A310EE3027C648D9CD@g01jpexmbkw24
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на RE: Timeout parameters  ("Nagaura, Ryohei" <nagaura.ryohei@jp.fujitsu.com>)
Ответы Re: Timeout parameters  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Thursday, April 4, 2019 5:20PM (GMT+9), Ryohei Nagaura wrote:

> > From: Fabien COELHO <coelho@cri.ensmp.fr>
> > * About socket_timeout v12 patch, I'm not sure there is a consensus.
> I think so too. I just made the patch being able to be committed anytime.
> 
> Finally, I rebased all the patches because they have come not to be applied to the updated PG.

I just checked and confirmed that the TCP USER TIMEOUT patch set v20 works.
Although you should capitalize "linux" to "Linux" as already mentioned before.
The committer can also just fix that very minor part, if patch is deemed committable.

Note to committer: The "Ready for Committer" status is mainly intended for
tcp user timeout parameter.

OTOH, unless there is consensus with the socket_timeout,
for now the socket_timeout patch status still remains as "Needs Review".

Regards,
Kirk Jamison




В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Pavan Deolasee
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Caveats from reloption toast_tuple_target
Следующее
От: Masahiko Sawada
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Block level parallel vacuum