RE: RI and PARSER (was: Re: [HACKERS] RI status report #1)

What does PENDANT imply/mean in terms of RI?  I could figure out all of the
other syntax.

> -----Original Message-----
> From:    wieck@debis.com [SMTP:wieck@debis.com]
> Sent:    Wednesday, September 29, 1999 9:03 AM
> To:    lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu
> Cc:    wieck@debis.com; tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us; hackers@postgreSQL.org
> Subject:    Re: RI and PARSER (was: Re: [HACKERS] RI status report #1)
> 
> Thomas Lockhart wrote:
> 
> >
> > > > >       CONSTRAINTS
> > > > >       DEFERRABLE
> > > > >       DEFERRED
> > > > >       IMMEDIATE
> > > > >       INITIALLY
> > > > >       PENDANT
> > > > >       RESTRICT
> > >     O.K.  - I was able to add them all to ColId without conflicts
> > >     for now.  Let's see what happens after adding the syntax  for
> > >     CREATE CONSTRAINT TRIGGER.
> >
> > Right. Anything which causes trouble can be demoted to ColLabel.
> >
> > >     I'm  not  sure which of them are SQL92 or SQL3, at least they
> > >     are all SQL3 "reserved" words according to the SQL3 draft.
> >
> > According to my Date and Darwen (which is mostly SQL92), all of these
> > except "PENDANT" are SQL92 reserved words. PENDANT is not mentioned,
> > so is presumably an SQL3-ism.
> >
> > Do you want me to update syntax.sgml?
> 
>     Please  be so kind. CREATE CONSTRAINT TRIGGER did not mess up
>     anything, so all these new reserved words appear in ColId and
>     are still available.
> 
> 
> Jan
> 
> --
> 
> #======================================================================#
> # It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
> # Let's break this rule - forgive me.                                  #
> #========================================= wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck) #
> 
> 
> 
> ************