RE: WAL settings

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Stephen Froehlich
Тема RE: WAL settings
Дата
Msg-id CY1PR0601MB19277EA2372E076A7106D51FE5F50@CY1PR0601MB1927.namprd06.prod.outlook.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: WAL settings  (J B <mrjanbernat@gmail.com>)
Ответы RE: WAL settings  (J B <mrjanbernat@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-novice

10 is the default value, as is wal_level = “replica”.

 

By the way, if you had checked your postgresql-10-main.log after you sent the reload command (always a good idea), it gives exactly this hint as I remember.

 

--Stephen

 

From: J B [mailto:mrjanbernat@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2018 8:10 AM
To: Andreas Kretschmer <andreas@a-kretschmer.de>
Cc: pgsql-novice@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: WAL settings

 

Wow thank you, i checked that this was commented out in 9.4 but with setting = 0, but 10.1 has this commented with = 10 so i assume its default value.

 

2018-02-14 13:50 GMT+01:00 Andreas Kretschmer <andreas@a-kretschmer.de>:



Am 14.02.2018 um 13:33 schrieb J B:

Hello

I have an issue with WAL settings with postgress 10.1 used for zabbix monitoring system. When i change WAL setting to "minimal" the database goes down. We used this setting in version 9.4 to improve performance of our monitoring server so i would like to replicate this setting.


you have to set max_wal_senders to 0.


Regards, Andreas

--
2ndQuadrant - The PostgreSQL Support Company.
www.2ndQuadrant.com

 

В списке pgsql-novice по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Stephen Froehlich
Дата:
Сообщение: RE: Bitmap Heap Scan taking ~60x as long for table when queried aspartition
Следующее
От: J B
Дата:
Сообщение: RE: WAL settings