Re: Arrays vs separate tables
| От | Michał Kłeczek |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Arrays vs separate tables |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CC75487C-BBDF-474D-880A-87FB6CEED812@kleczek.org обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Arrays vs separate tables (Rich Shepard <rshepard@appl-ecosys.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Arrays vs separate tables
|
| Список | pgsql-general |
> On 20 Oct 2025, at 14:55, Rich Shepard <rshepard@appl-ecosys.com> wrote: > > On Mon, 20 Oct 2025, Peter J. Holzer wrote: > >> * Simplicity: If a set of values is always fetched together and updated >> together, you might as well treat it as a unit and not split it over >> multiple tables > >> The second may be relevant for you. If you always display and edit the >> phone numbers of a contact together and your frontend makes it easier to >> edit an array than a subset of rows from a table, you might just stuff >> them into a table and ignore "purity". > > Peter, > > Thank you. That's my use case. There is also another concern - do you want to make sure phone numbers are not shared? — Michal
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: