Re: Question on creating keys on partitioned tables

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Siddharth Jain
Тема Re: Question on creating keys on partitioned tables
Дата
Msg-id CAPqV3pTuTV6qPpvWT8f67yd8EPP79vk2Ww5ddJkwmEdWCCQdXA@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Question on creating keys on partitioned tables  (Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at>)
Ответы Re: Question on creating keys on partitioned tables  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-general
Thanks Laurenz.

I think the two are equivalent. If not, could you please explain why? 

On Fri, Mar 31, 2023 at 6:46 AM Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at> wrote:
On Thu, 2023-03-30 at 17:05 -0700, Siddharth Jain wrote:
> I have this question. Say I create a partitioned table on column X.
>
> Option 1:
>
> I add a primary key on (X,Y). Y is another column. Even though Y is a globally unique PK (global meaning it is unique across partitions, not just in one partition), Postgres does not allow me to
> create a PK on Y in a partitioned table.
>
> Option 2:
>
> I add PK on Y on each of the partitions
>
> Are these not equivalent? If not, which is better and why?

No, they are not equivalent.

Option 2 comes closer to guaranteeing uniqueness for column X, so use that.

> PS: This is what my best friend had to say:
>
> [...] If you are using the "table inheritance" approach [...]

Don't even consider that.  Declarative partitioning is so much better.

Yours,
Laurenz Albe

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Arnaud Lesauvage
Дата:
Сообщение: RE: Cannot terminate backend
Следующее
От: Paul Ramsey
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Cannot terminate backend