Re: [HACKERS] Bug in to_timestamp().

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Alexander Korotkov
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Bug in to_timestamp().
Дата
Msg-id CAPpHfdvznd2bfykLSYYE0LL+1WiiDp8FtpVWxfZ_Ty_Rq23Y-Q@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] Bug in to_timestamp().  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] Bug in to_timestamp().  (Alexander Korotkov <a.korotkov@postgrespro.ru>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Sat, Jul 7, 2018 at 12:31 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Alexander Korotkov <a.korotkov@postgrespro.ru> writes:
> > I tool a look at this patch.  It looks good for me.  It applies
> > cleanly on last master, builds without warnings, passes tests.
> > Functionality seems to be well-covered by documentation and regression
> > tests.  So, I'm going to commit it if no objections.
>
> AFAIR, the argument was mainly over whether we agreed with the proposed
> behavioral changes.  It seems a bit premature to me to commit given that
> there's not consensus on that.

Ok.  I've briefly looked to the thread, and I thought there is
consensus already.  Given your concern, I'll investigate this thread
in detail and come up with summary.

------
Alexander Korotkov
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Andres Freund
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Faster str to int conversion (was Table with large number of intcolumns, very slow COPY FROM)
Следующее
От: Tomas Vondra
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: WAL prefetch