Re: Failures with wal_consistency_checking and 13~

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Alexander Korotkov
Тема Re: Failures with wal_consistency_checking and 13~
Дата
Msg-id CAPpHfdvMN=1PpKqWMBdXKi7m9nwZh1uE8-1Hn4ntGtbKssaMFg@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Failures with wal_consistency_checking and 13~  (Alexander Korotkov <a.korotkov@postgrespro.ru>)
Ответы Re: Failures with wal_consistency_checking and 13~  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Sat, Jun 20, 2020 at 1:16 PM Alexander Korotkov
<a.korotkov@postgrespro.ru> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 10:34 PM Alvaro Herrera
> <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> >
> > On 2020-Jun-15, Michael Paquier wrote:
> >
> > > I have begun my annual study of WAL consistency across replays, and
> > > wal_consistency_checking = 'all' is pointing out at some issues with
> > > at least VACUUM and SPGist:
> > > FATAL:  inconsistent page found, rel 1663/16385/22133, forknum 0,
> > > blkno 15
> > > CONTEXT:  WAL redo at 0/739CEDE8 for SPGist/VACUUM_REDIRECT: newest
> > > XID 4619
> > >
> > > It may be possible that there are other failures, I have just run
> > > installcheck and this is the first failure I saw after replaying all
> > > the generated WAL on a standby.  Please note that I have also checked
> > > 12, and installcheck passes.
> >
> > Umm.  Alexander, do you an idea of what this is about?
>
> I don't have idea yet, but I'll check this out

I have discovered and fixed the issue in a44dd932ff.  spg_mask()
masked unused space only when pagehdr->pd_lower >
SizeOfPageHeaderData.  But during the vacuum regression tests, one
page has been erased completely and pagehdr->pd_lower was set to
SizeOfPageHeaderData.  Actually, 13 didn't introduce any issue, it
just added a test that spotted the issue.  The issue is here since
a507b86900.

------
Regards,
Alexander Korotkov



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Dmitry Dolgov
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: POC: GROUP BY optimization
Следующее
От: Alexander Korotkov
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: git.postgresql.org ok?