On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 8:22 PM, Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> wrote:
On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 10:20 AM, Teodor Sigaev <teodor@sigaev.ru> wrote: > As far I can see, there is no any on-disk representation differece for > *existing* indexes. So, pg_upgrade is not need here and there isn't any new > code to support "on-fly" modification. Am I right?
Yes.
I'm going to look at this again today, and will post something within 12 hours. Please hold off on committing until then.
Thank you.
Thinking about that again, I found that we should relax our requirements to
"minus infinity" items, because pg_upgraded indexes doesn't have any
special bits set for those items.
What do you think about applying following patch on the top of v14?