Re: MergeJoin beats HashJoin in the case of multiple hash clauses
От | Alexander Korotkov |
---|---|
Тема | Re: MergeJoin beats HashJoin in the case of multiple hash clauses |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAPpHfducAP9Q1L0gG42ybMrvq2wvc60Lb8s8XebohNC151zCBw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: MergeJoin beats HashJoin in the case of multiple hash clauses (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>) |
Ответы |
Re: MergeJoin beats HashJoin in the case of multiple hash clauses
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Apr 11, 2025 at 5:06 AM Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote: > On 2025-04-11 00:47:19 +0200, Matthias van de Meent wrote: > > On Fri, 11 Apr 2025 at 00:27, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote: > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > On 2025-03-09 14:13:52 +0200, Alexander Korotkov wrote: > > > > I've revised commit message, comments, formatting etc. > > > > I'm going to push this if no objections. > > > > > > I'm rather confused as to why this is a thing to push at this point? This > > > doesn't seem to be a bugfix and it's post feature freeze. > > > > I think the patch from that mail got committed as 6bb6a62f about a > > month ago, which was shortly after Alexander's message. Did you get > > confused about the month of his message, or by the incorrect state of > > the CF entry? > > Sorry for that Alexander - for some reason the email just showed up as new in > my inbox and I only looked at the date, not the month :( Not a problem at all! ------ Regards, Alexander Korotkov Supabase
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: