On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 11:16 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>
> Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com> writes:
> > What about "Range/Multirange Functions and Operators"?
>
> Better than a comma, I guess. Personally I didn't have a
> problem with the form with two "ands".
Thank you. I propose to push the slash option because it both evades
double "and" and it's aligned with sibling section headers (we have
"Date/Time Functions and Operators").
Any objections?
------
Regards,
Alexander Korotkov