Re: Challenges preventing us moving to 64 bit transaction id (XID)?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Alexander Korotkov
Тема Re: Challenges preventing us moving to 64 bit transaction id (XID)?
Дата
Msg-id CAPpHfdtOvP6Urvd8SJaG--R-S=gaJN927a-1=tJoXagfbi4Efg@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Challenges preventing us moving to 64 bit transaction id (XID)?  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Ответы Re: Challenges preventing us moving to 64 bit transaction id (XID)?  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Re: Challenges preventing us moving to 64 bit transaction id (XID)?  (Chris Travers <chris.travers@adjust.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения
Hi!

On Fri, Mar 2, 2018 at 1:41 AM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
On 2018-01-11 01:02:52 +0300, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
> As I get from cputube, patchset doesn't compiles again.  Please find
> revised version attached.

It'd be good if you could maintain the patches as commits with some
description of why you're doing these changes.  It's a bit hard to
figure that out sometimes and having to dig through a thread with quite
some discussion certainly makes it less likely to be looked at.

Thank you for pointing.  In future I'll maintain patches with their description.
BTW, during FOSDEM developer meeting we decided that I should extract
64-bit in-memory representation of xids and resubmit it, while 64-bit
on-disk reprensentation should become a pluggable table access method.
I didn't manage to do this before current commitfest.  Also, the last commitfest
is already too late for such big changes.  So, I'm marking this RWF.

------
Alexander Korotkov
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company 

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Peter Geoghegan
Дата:
Сообщение: pgstat_report_activity() and parallel CREATE INDEX (was: Parallelindex creation & pg_stat_activity)
Следующее
От: Andres Freund
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Challenges preventing us moving to 64 bit transaction id (XID)?