Re: SQL/JSON path: collation for comparisons, minor typos in docs

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Alexander Korotkov
Тема Re: SQL/JSON path: collation for comparisons, minor typos in docs
Дата
Msg-id CAPpHfdt7YiiydbgrfSp3RnDx8eMk7XB3g4XBKdpHM3JCiMH0kQ@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: SQL/JSON path: collation for comparisons, minor typos in docs  (Markus Winand <markus.winand@winand.at>)
Ответы Re: SQL/JSON path: collation for comparisons, minor typos in docs  (Alexander Korotkov <a.korotkov@postgrespro.ru>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Hi, Markus!

On Thu, Aug 8, 2019 at 11:53 AM Markus Winand <markus.winand@winand.at> wrote:
> The patch makes my tests pass.

Cool.

> I wonder about a few things:
>
> - Isn’t there any code that could be re-used for that (the one triggered by ‘a’ < ‘A’ COLLATE ucs_basic)?

PostgreSQL supports ucs_basic, but it's alias to C collation and works
only for utf-8.  Jsonpath code may work in different encodings.  New
string comparison code can work in different encodings.

> - For object key members, the standard also refers to unicode code point collation (SQL-2:2016 4.46.3, last
paragraph).
> - I guess it also applies to the “starts with” predicate, but I cannot find this explicitly stated in the standard.

For object keys we don't actually care about whether strings are less
or greater.  We only search for equal keys.  So, per-byte comparison
we currently use should be fine.  The same states for "starts with"
predicate.

> My tests check whether those cases do case-sensitive comparisons. With my default collation "en_US.UTF-8” I cannot
discoverpotential issues there. I haven’t played around with nondeterministic ICU collations yet :( 

That's OK. There should be other beta testers around :)


------
Alexander Korotkov
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: POC: Cleaning up orphaned files using undo logs
Следующее
От: Ibrar Ahmed
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Small const correctness patch