Re: pgsql: Introduce framework for parallelizing various pg_upgrade tasks.
От | Alexander Korotkov |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pgsql: Introduce framework for parallelizing various pg_upgrade tasks. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAPpHfdszjX1CSii7iuXf7jZcDb+PXYGdcVrGpRct3hemx821CQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | pgsql: Introduce framework for parallelizing various pg_upgrade tasks. (Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org>) |
Список | pgsql-committers |
Hi! On Tue, Sep 17, 2024 at 12:11 AM Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> wrote: > Introduce framework for parallelizing various pg_upgrade tasks. > > A number of pg_upgrade steps require connecting to every database > in the cluster and running the same query in each one. When there > are many databases, these steps are particularly time-consuming, > especially since they are performed sequentially, i.e., we connect > to a database, run the query, and process the results before moving > on to the next database. > > This commit introduces a new framework that makes it easy to > parallelize most of these once-in-each-database tasks by processing > multiple databases concurrently. This framework manages a set of > slots that follow a simple state machine, and it uses libpq's > asynchronous APIs to establish the connections and run the queries. > The --jobs option is used to determine the number of slots to use. > To use this new task framework, callers simply need to provide the > query and a callback function to process its results, and the > framework takes care of the rest. A more complete description is > provided at the top of the new task.c file. > > None of the eligible once-in-each-database tasks are converted to > use this new framework in this commit. That will be done via > several follow-up commits. > > Reviewed-by: Jeff Davis, Robert Haas, Daniel Gustafsson, Ilya Gladyshev, Corey Huinker > Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20240516211638.GA1688936%40nathanxps13 Should we add UpgradeTaskProcessCB to the typedefs.list? I don't see this would directly influence indentation right now, but probably we should do for uniformity? ------ Regards, Alexander Korotkov Supabase
В списке pgsql-committers по дате отправления: