Re: pgsql: Fix more holes with SLRU code in need of int64 for segment numbe
От | Alexander Korotkov |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pgsql: Fix more holes with SLRU code in need of int64 for segment numbe |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAPpHfdsv-s+qA_yAnVfQ6D+5_qN-ZbE5u1k-CO9a4qpAOBA1iA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pgsql: Fix more holes with SLRU code in need of int64 for segment numbe (Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: pgsql: Fix more holes with SLRU code in need of int64 for segment numbe
|
Список | pgsql-committers |
On Wed, Aug 14, 2024 at 5:13 AM Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Aug 13, 2024 at 1:30 AM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote: > > > On Aug 13, 2024, at 6:35, Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com> wrote:. > > > > > > As pointed by Noah Misch [1], unlike the commit the patch [2] also > > > changed segment-returning functions to return int64. Thus, in the > > > patch output formats make much more sense, because they match the > > > input data types. Michael, are you intended to push the remaining > > > part of the patch [2]? > > > > Guess so. I could look at that next week, not before. > > OK. I made an attached patch from the missing parts. > Do you mind if I push that? If yes, feel free to use it. I mean, I'd like to push it if you don't object. If you object and like to push it yourself, feel free to use this patch. ------ Regards, Alexander Korotkov Supabase
В списке pgsql-committers по дате отправления: