Re: pgsql: Improve runtime and output of tests for replication slots checkp
От | Alexander Korotkov |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pgsql: Improve runtime and output of tests for replication slots checkp |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAPpHfdsedYNmKDnDuueJor2k8kA+hgEJKFJRf4PhDowdP_A4Bg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | pgsql: Improve runtime and output of tests for replication slots checkp (Alexander Korotkov <akorotkov@postgresql.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: pgsql: Improve runtime and output of tests for replication slots checkp
|
Список | pgsql-committers |
On Sat, Jun 21, 2025 at 1:25 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > I wrote: > > But in the buildfarm failures I don't see any 'checkpoint complete' > > before the shutdown. > > Ooops, I lied: we have at least one case where the checkpoint does > finish but then it hangs up anyway: > > https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_stage_log.pl?nm=melonworm&dt=2025-06-20%2019%3A59%3A31&stg=recovery-check > > 2025-06-20 20:05:32.548 UTC [3171474][client backend][61/2:0] LOG: statement: select injection_points_wakeup('checkpoint-before-old-wal-removal') > 2025-06-20 20:05:32.550 UTC [3162113][checkpointer][:0] LOG: checkpoint complete: wrote 1 buffers (0.0%), wrote 0 SLRUbuffers; 0 WAL file(s) added, 0 removed, 0 recycled; write=0.045 s, sync=0.001 s, total=1.507 s; sync files=1, longest=0.001s, average=0.001 s; distance=327688 kB, estimate=327688 kB; lsn=0/290020C0, redo lsn=0/29002068 > 2025-06-20 20:05:32.551 UTC [3171474][client backend][:0] LOG: disconnection: session time: 0:00:00.073 user=bf database=postgreshost=[local] > 2025-06-20 20:05:32.552 UTC [3170563][client backend][:0] LOG: disconnection: session time: 0:00:01.538 user=bf database=postgreshost=[local] > 2025-06-20 20:05:32.564 UTC [3163446][client backend][7/146:0] LOG: statement: SELECT 1 > 2025-06-20 20:05:32.564 UTC [3161873][postmaster][:0] LOG: received immediate shutdown request > 2025-06-20 20:05:32.604 UTC [3161873][postmaster][:0] LOG: database system is shut down > > I'm still confused about whether the 046 script intends to > sometimes test cases where the checkpoint doesn't have time to > complete. But it seems that whatever is going on here > is a bit subtle and platform-dependent. I think this indicates unfinished intention to wait for checkpoint completion. But I think both cases (checkpoint finished and unfinished) should work correctly. So, I believe there is a backend problem. I'm trying to reproduce this locally. Sorry for the confusion. ------ Regards, Alexander Korotkov Supabase
В списке pgsql-committers по дате отправления: