Re: WIP: Covering + unique indexes.

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Alexander Korotkov
Тема Re: WIP: Covering + unique indexes.
Дата
Msg-id CAPpHfdsORjuUoEbAi-maApOXsyQNrfy9SyZuzDbOMic3uT-CcQ@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: WIP: Covering + unique indexes.  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>)
Ответы Re: WIP: Covering + unique indexes.  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>)
Re: WIP: Covering + unique indexes. (the good and the bad)  (Erik Rijkers <er@xs4all.nl>)
Re: WIP: Covering + unique indexes.  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 8:42 PM, Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> wrote:
On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 10:33 AM, Alexander Korotkov
<a.korotkov@postgrespro.ru> wrote:
> Thinking about that again, I found that we should relax our requirements to
> "minus infinity" items, because pg_upgraded indexes doesn't have any
> special bits set for those items.
>
> What do you think about applying following patch on the top of v14?

It's clearly necessary. Looks fine to me.

OK, incorporated into v15.  I've also added sentence about pg_upgrade
to the commit message.

------
Alexander Korotkov
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company 
Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tomas Vondra
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Online enabling of checksums
Следующее
От: Andres Freund
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Online enabling of checksums