Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Call RelationDropStorage() for broader range ofobject drops.

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Alexander Korotkov
Тема Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Call RelationDropStorage() for broader range ofobject drops.
Дата
Msg-id CAPpHfds6c_a1kSL6u9B1_w3zJxYcoriQwVWpdCjc_CO6Qdih-g@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Call RelationDropStorage() for broader rangeof object drops.  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Call RelationDropStorage() for broader range ofobject drops.  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения
On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 1:05 PM, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> wrote:
Hadi Moshayedi wrote:
> To provide more context, in cstore_fdw creating the storage is easy, we
> only need to hook into CREATE FOREIGN TABLE using event triggers. Removing
> the storage is not that easy, for DROP FOREIGN TABLE we can use event
> triggers.

This all sounds a little more complicated than it should ... but since
FDW are not really IMO the right interface to be implementing a
different storage format, I'm not terribly on board with supporting this
more completely.  So what you're doing now is probably acceptable.

+1,
FDW looks OK for prototyping pluggable storage, but it doesn't seem suitable for permanent implementation.
BTW, Hadi, could you visit "Pluggable storage" thread and check how suitable upcoming pluggable storage API is for cstore?

------
Alexander Korotkov
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company 

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Clarification in pg10's pgupgrade.html step 10(upgrading standby servers)
Следующее
От: Nico Williams
Дата:
Сообщение: [HACKERS] COMMIT TRIGGERs, take n, implemented with CONSTRAINT TRIGGERS