On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 12:30 PM Etsuro Fujita <etsuro.fujita@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > + * We'll prefer to consider this join async-capable if any table from
> > > + * either side of the join is considered async-capable.
> > > + */
> > > + fpinfo->async_capable = fpinfo_o->async_capable ||
> > > + fpinfo_i->async_capable;
> I updated the above comment so that it explains the reason. Please
> find attached a patch. I did some cleanup as well:
I have committed the patch.
Best regards,
Etsuro Fujita