Hi Justin,
On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 12:58 AM Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com> wrote:
> On Mon, May 09, 2022 at 11:37:35AM -0400, Jonathan S. Katz wrote:
> > - If multiple foreign servers with this option enabled are involved in
> > - a local (sub)transaction, multiple remote (sub)transactions opened on
> > - those foreign servers in the local (sub)transaction are committed in
> > - parallel across those foreign servers when the local (sub)transaction
> > - commits.
> > + If multiple foreign servers with this option enabled have a local
> > + transaction, multiple remote transactions on those foreign servers are
> > + committed in parallel across those foreign servers when the local
> > + transaction is committed.
> > </para>
>
> I think "have a transaction" doesn't sound good, and the old language "involved
> in" was better.
I think so too.
Thanks!
Best regards,
Etsuro Fujita