Re: Costing elided SubqueryScans more nearly correctly

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Etsuro Fujita
Тема Re: Costing elided SubqueryScans more nearly correctly
Дата
Msg-id CAPmGK177W5Svia4_Py+D368H+eA8QuhJdAW7AnxoWqx_kn_3LA@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Costing elided SubqueryScans more nearly correctly  (Richard Guo <guofenglinux@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
On Thu, May 5, 2022 at 4:30 PM Richard Guo <guofenglinux@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, May 5, 2022 at 7:03 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> 1015 improvements to 14 disimprovements isn't a bad score.  I'm
>> a bit surprised there are that many removable SubqueryScans TBH;
>> maybe that's an artifact of all the "SELECT *" queries.

> The patch looks sane to me. 1015 vs 14 is a good win.

+1

Best regards,
Etsuro Fujita

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Yura Sokolov
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: PG15 beta1 sort performance regression due to Generation context change
Следующее
От: Amit Kapila
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: bogus: logical replication rows/cols combinations