On Fri, May 7, 2021 at 2:12 AM Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> wrote:
> I'd suggest the language point out that it's not actually possible to do
> otherwise, since they all need to be part of the same transaction.
>
> Without that, it looks like we're just missing a trick somewhere and
> someone might think that they could improve PG to open multiple
> connections to the same remote server to execute them in parallel.
Agreed.
> Maybe:
>
> In order to ensure that the data being returned from a foreign server
> is consistent, postgres_fdw will only open one connection for a given
> foreign server and will run all queries against that server sequentially
> even if there are multiple foreign tables involved. In such a case, it
> may be more performant to disable this option to eliminate the overhead
> associated with running queries asynchronously.
Ok, I’ll merge this into the next version.
Thanks!
Best regards,
Etsuro Fujita