On Fri, Jun 4, 2021 at 7:26 PM Etsuro Fujita <etsuro.fujita@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 1, 2021 at 6:30 PM Etsuro Fujita <etsuro.fujita@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Fri, May 28, 2021 at 10:53 PM Etsuro Fujita <etsuro.fujita@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Fri, May 28, 2021 at 5:29 PM Kyotaro Horiguchi
> > > <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > The patch drops some "= NULL" (initial) initializations when
> > > > nasyncplans == 0. AFAICS makeNode() fills the returned memory with
> > > > zeroes but I'm not sure it is our convention to omit the
> > > > intializations.
> > >
> > > I’m not sure, but I think we omit it in some cases; for example, we
> > > don’t set as_valid_subplans to NULL explicitly in ExecInitAppend(), if
> > > do_exec_prune=true.
> >
> > Ok, I think it would be a good thing to initialize the
> > pointers/variables to NULL/zero explicitly, so I updated the patch as
> > such. Barring objections, I'll get the patch committed in a few days.
>
> I'm replanning to push this early next week for some reason.
Pushed. I will close this in the open items list for v14.
Best regards,
Etsuro Fujita