Re: Breaking compile-time dependency cycles of Postgres subdirs?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Christian Convey
Тема Re: Breaking compile-time dependency cycles of Postgres subdirs?
Дата
Msg-id CAPfS4Zykb-HzUS2Lcm3V5WB2xT3C0oZuhKx9pser7E0Th=XOzA@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Breaking compile-time dependency cycles of Postgres subdirs?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 10:28 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
I think if it had been a clear, enforced goal all along, it might've been
possible to build the system with such a restriction (for the most part at
least).  At this point though, the amount of work and code churn involved
seems like it'd far exceed the benefits.


That makes sense to me.  I certainly didn't think it was a slam-dunk that what I was proposing would be an improvement.  It just seemed like a question worth asking.  Thanks for your thoughts.

- Christian

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Breaking compile-time dependency cycles of Postgres subdirs?
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Memory ordering issue in LWLockRelease, WakeupWaiters, WALInsertSlotRelease