Re: Performance issues

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Felipe Santos
Тема Re: Performance issues
Дата
Msg-id CAPYcRiXaDMLw4YWCFcEpTLg7DT1NJVGHfUm06aAb135xZwO2Zw@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Performance issues  (Vivekanand Joshi <vjoshi@zetainteractive.com>)
Список pgsql-performance


2015-03-18 14:31 GMT-03:00 Vivekanand Joshi <vjoshi@zetainteractive.com>:
So, here is the first taste of success and which gives me the confidence
that if properly worked out with a good hardware and proper tuning,
PostgreSQL could be a good replacement.

Out of the 9 reports which needs to be migrated in PostgreSQL, 3 are now
running.

Report 4 was giving an issue and I will see it tomorrow.

Just to inform you guys that, the thing that helped most is setting
enable_nestloops to false worked. Plans are now not miscalculated.




Regards,
Vivek

-----Original Message-----
From: pgsql-performance-owner@postgresql.org
[mailto:pgsql-performance-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Tomas Vondra
Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2015 9:00 PM
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] Performance issues

On 17.3.2015 16:24, Thomas Kellerer wrote:
> Tomas Vondra schrieb am 17.03.2015 um 15:43:
>> On 17.3.2015 15:19, Thomas Kellerer wrote:
>>> Tomas Vondra schrieb am 17.03.2015 um 14:55:
>>>>  (2) using window functions, e.g. like this:
>>>>
>>>>      SELECT * FROM (
>>>>        SELECT *,
>>>>             ROW_NUMBER() OVER (PARTITION BY touchpoint_execution_id
>>>>                                ORDER BY FROM max_creation_dt) AS rn
>>>>        FROM s_f_touchpoint_execution_status_history
>>>>      ) foo WHERE rn = 1
>>>>
>>>>      But estimating this is also rather difficult ...
>>>
>>>
>>> From my experience rewriting something like the above using DISTINCT
>>> ON is usually faster.
>>
>> How do you get the last record (with respect to a timestamp column)
>> using a DISTINCT ON?
>
> You need to use "order by ... desc". See here:
> http://sqlfiddle.com/#!15/d4846/2

Nice, thanks!

>
> Btw: your row_number() usage wouldn't return the "latest" row either.
> It would return the "oldest" row.

Oh, right. I forgot the DESC in the window.


--
Tomas Vondra                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services


--
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance


--
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance




"But this is not a production-suitable setting. So what do you think how to
get a work around this?"

What about creating a read-only replica and apply this setting there?

В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Vivekanand Joshi
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Performance issues
Следующее
От: Jerry Sievers
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Performance issues