Re: Choosing between Intel 320, Intel 510 or OCZ Vertex 3 SSD for db server

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Amitabh Kant
Тема Re: Choosing between Intel 320, Intel 510 or OCZ Vertex 3 SSD for db server
Дата
Msg-id CAPTAQB+Y03r1B72b+sBeTadDPoY+OLrDEP8gpV2z=5cZwLOS2w@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Choosing between Intel 320, Intel 510 or OCZ Vertex 3 SSD for db server  (David Boreham <david_list@boreham.org>)
Ответы Re: Choosing between Intel 320, Intel 510 or OCZ Vertex 3 SSD for db server  (David Boreham <david_list@boreham.org>)
Список pgsql-performance
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 10:23 PM, David Boreham <david_list@boreham.org> wrote:

A few quick thoughts:

1. 320 would be the only SSD I'd trust from your short-list. It's the only one with proper protection from unexpected power loss.
2. Multiple RAID'ed SSDs sounds like (vast) overkill for your workload. A single SSD should be sufficient (will get you several thousand TPS on pgbench for your DB size).
3. Consider not using the magnetic disks at all (saves on space, power and the cost of the RAID controller for them).
4. Consider using Intel 710 series rather than 320 (pay for them with the money saved from #3 above). Those devices have much, much higher specified endurance than the 320s and since your DB is quite small you only need to buy one of them.


On 10/24/2011 8:09 AM, Amitabh Kant wrote:
Hello

I need to choose between Intel 320 , Intel 510 and OCZ Vertex 3 SSD's for my database server. From recent reading in the list and other places, I have come to understand that OCZ Vertex 3 should not be used, Intel 510 uses a Marvel controller while Intel 320 had a nasty bug which has been rectified. So the list narrows down to only 510 and 320, unless I have understood the OCZ Vertex reviews incorrectly.

The server would itself be built along these lines: Dual CPU Xeon 5620, 32 or 48 GB RAM, 2 SAS 10K disk in RAID 1 for OS, 2 SAS 10K disk in RAID 1 for pg_xlog and 4 SSD in RAID 10 for data directory (overkill??). OS would be FreeBSD 8.2 (I would be tuning the sysctl variables). PG version would be 9.1 with replication set to another machine (Dual CPU Xeon 54xx, 32 GB RAM, 6 15K SAS 146 GB: 4 in RAID 10 for data and 2 in RAID 1 for OS + pg_xlog). The second machine hosts my current db , and there is not much of an issue with the performance. We need better redundancy now(current was to take a dump/backup every 12 hours), so the new machine.

My database itself is not very big, approx 40 GB as of now, and would not grow beyond 80 GB in the next year or two. There are some tables where insert & updates are fairly frequent. From what I could gather, we are not doing more than 300-400 tps at the moment, and the growth should not be very high in the short term.

Hope someone can give some pointers to which SSD I should go for at the moment.


Amitabh


Sadly, 710 is not that easily available around here at the moment.


Amitabh 

В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Amitabh Kant
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Usage of pg_stat_database
Следующее
От: Mohamed Hashim
Дата:
Сообщение: Performance Problem with postgresql 9.03, 8GB RAM,Quadcore Processor Server--Need help!!!!!!!